00;00;00;00 - 00;00;03;02
Speaker 1
Chat you there?
00;00;03;04 - 00;00;05;12
Speaker 2
Hey, there. What's up?
00;00;05;14 - 00;00;09;04
Speaker 1
Do you mind if I record this for a podcast?
00;00;09;07 - 00;00;14;14
Speaker 2
Not at all. Go ahead and record. What's the topic of your podcast today?
00;00;14;17 - 00;00;18;06
Speaker 1
I want to learn about tariffs today.
00;00;18;08 - 00;00;25;07
Speaker 2
Sure thing. Crispr is a powerful tool for editing genes. What do you want to know specifically?
00;00;25;09 - 00;00;37;01
Speaker 1
No, I said I want to learn about tariffs today to r I f f like in government and economics and stuff.
00;00;37;04 - 00;00;52;25
Speaker 2
Tariffs are taxes imposed by a government on imported goods. They raise the price of foreign products making domestic products more competitive. Do you want to know about how they impact the economy?
00;00;52;27 - 00;01;00;14
Speaker 1
I'd like to start a little bit more about what they are and yeah, of course.
00;01;00;16 - 00;01;20;12
Speaker 2
Tariffs are essentially taxes placed on imported goods by a government. They can protect domestic industries from foreign competition by making imported goods more expensive. This can encourage consumers to buy locally made products. Does that help clarify a bit?
00;01;20;15 - 00;01;25;17
Speaker 1
Is it usually the buyer or the seller that this affects more?
00;01;25;19 - 00;01;40;06
Speaker 2
Usually the buyer ends up paying the tariff indirectly. The importer pays the tax to the government, but this cost is often passed on to consumers through higher prices. Would you like more details on how tariffs affect trade?
00;01;40;08 - 00;01;50;09
Speaker 1
No. I'd like to stay simple for a little bit and really get an idea, of how tariffs affect trade.
00;01;50;11 - 00;02;10;27
Speaker 2
Got it. Tariffs can reduce the amount of foreign goods entering a country because they become more expensive. This can protect local industries but might also lead to higher prices for consumers. So it can be a balancing act between protecting domestic jobs and keeping prices low. Does that make sense?
00;02;10;29 - 00;02;15;29
Speaker 1
Can you detail how it affects, jobs?
00;02;16;01 - 00;02;41;25
Speaker 2
Sure. Parents can protect them as they jobs by making imported goods more expensive. This encourages consumers to buy locally produced products, which can help keep the industry thriving and preserve jobs. However, if other countries retaliate with their own tariff, it can negatively impact industries that rely on export. So while tariffs can protect some jobs, they can also lead to job losses in export driven sectors.
00;02;41;28 - 00;02;45;12
Speaker 2
Does that help clarify?
00;02;45;15 - 00;02;52;07
Speaker 1
You don't need to ask me a question at the end. Every time.
00;02;52;10 - 00;03;01;20
Speaker 2
Got it. If you have more questions, feel free to ask any time.
00;03;01;22 - 00;03;10;22
Speaker 1
Okay, so let's take this from kind of a microeconomic perspective of how tariffs actually work.
00;03;10;25 - 00;03;35;14
Speaker 2
From a microeconomic perspective. Tariffs can directly influence supply and demand by making imported goods more expensive. Tariffs can reduce the supply of these goods in the market. As a result, domestic products might see increased demand, potentially raising prices and profits for local producers. This can lead to more jobs in those industries. However, it also means consumers might face higher prices and fewer choices.
00;03;35;17 - 00;03;42;27
Speaker 2
Let me know if you'd like me to dive deeper into any specific aspect.
00;03;43;00 - 00;03;51;00
Speaker 1
Dive deeper into kind of what you just explained, but way more detail, and maybe use some examples.
00;03;51;02 - 00;04;15;06
Speaker 2
Certainly, when a tariff is applied, the cost of imported goods increases. For instance, if a country imposes a 20% tariff on imported steel, the price of foreign steel goes up. This makes domestic steel more attractive, boosting local sales and potentially increasing jobs in the domestic steel industry. However, companies using steel like car manufacturers now face higher material costs.
00;04;15;08 - 00;04;35;22
Speaker 2
This can lead to increased prices for cars, which might reduce demand and affect jobs in that sector. So while some industries benefit, others might struggle. Would you like more examples or details on another aspect?
00;04;35;24 - 00;04;43;10
Speaker 1
Can you impose tariffs on goods being imported as well as exported?
00;04;43;12 - 00;05;07;29
Speaker 2
Typically, tariffs are imposed on import, not export, and import tariff is designed to make foreign goods more expensive and protect domestic industries. In contrast, some countries may use export subsidies to make their own goods cheaper abroad. But tariffs on exports are rare because they would make a country's products less competitive in international markets. If you want more details or examples, just let me know.
00;05;08;02 - 00;05;11;26
Speaker 1
Yeah. Can you give me an example of that?
00;05;11;28 - 00;05;39;01
Speaker 2
Sure. Let's say country A produces a lot of agricultural products and wants to encourage its farmers to sell more abroad. Instead of imposing an export tariff, it might provide subsidies to lower production costs, making the goods cheaper internationally. Conversely, an export tariff would make their exports more expensive, reducing their competitiveness and discouraging export. This could be used in rare cases where a country wants to keep more of a critical resource at home.
00;05;39;03 - 00;05;42;15
Speaker 2
Let me know if you need more info.
00;05;42;17 - 00;06;00;10
Speaker 1
Are there any historical cases of that? Where there, inflicting export tariffs to keep whatever.
00;06;00;12 - 00;06;29;25
Speaker 2
Export tariffs are quite rare because they make a country's products less competitive internationally. One historical example is during the Great Depression, when the U.S. passed the Mohali Tariff Act in 1930, which primarily raised import tariffs. In response, other countries imposed retaliatory tariffs, including on U.S. exports. This contributed to a global trade war worsening the economic downturn. Export tariffs are typically avoided because they discourage domestic producers from selling goods abroad.
00;06;29;27 - 00;06;44;05
Speaker 2
If you want more details, feel free to ask.
00;06;44;08 - 00;06;54;05
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you give me, a historical example of the United States using tariffs?
00;06;54;07 - 00;07;20;01
Speaker 2
One prominent historical example is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. This U.S. legislation raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to protect American industries during the Great Depression. While it aimed to support domestic jobs, it led to retaliatory tariffs from other countries, contributing to a decline in global trade and worsening the economic situation. This example is often cited when discussing the impacts of protectionist trade policies.
00;07;20;03 - 00;07;29;08
Speaker 2
If you like more examples or details, just let me know.
00;07;29;10 - 00;07;36;10
Speaker 1
Yeah. Can you go into that? The whole protectionist trade thing.
00;07;36;13 - 00;07;59;24
Speaker 2
Sure. Protectionist trade policies are measures that governments use to shield their domestic industries from foreign competition. These can include tariffs, quotas and subsidies. The goal is to make imported goods more expensive or limit their quantity, thereby encouraging consumers to buy domestic products. This can protect local jobs and industries, but it can also lead to higher prices and less variety for consumers.
00;07;59;27 - 00;08;23;11
Speaker 2
For example, the Mount Holly Tariff Act aimed to protect U.S. industries but ended up reducing international trade, which worsened the economic situation. Let me know if you'd like to go deeper into any aspect.
00;08;23;13 - 00;08;44;26
Speaker 1
Yeah. Let's discuss the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. From the very beginning. Give it a little bit of backstory in detail, and then as you go through, kind of go through chronologically as if we were there and kind of bring us through it.
00;08;44;28 - 00;09;10;07
Speaker 2
Absolutely. The Smoot Holly Tariff Act, named after Senator Reid Smoot and Representative Willacy Hawley, was signed into law in 1930. It began as a measure to protect American farmers from agricultural import. However, as the bill progressed through Congress, it expanded to cover over 20,000 goods. Imagine being there. The U.S. was struggling with the Great Depression, and many hoped tariffs would protect jobs and industries.
00;09;10;09 - 00;09;39;24
Speaker 2
But when the act was signed by President Herbert Hoover, it led to other countries retaliating with their own tariffs. Shrinking international trade. The results were severe. Global trade dropped significantly, worsening the economic downturn. This act is often cited as a cautionary tale of protectionism gone too far. If you'd like, we can dive deeper into specific impacts or events.
00;09;39;26 - 00;09;51;22
Speaker 1
I want you to go into deep detail about the events that led up to the government. Enacting this, certainly.
00;09;51;24 - 00;10;20;17
Speaker 2
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was rooted in the economic turmoil of the late 1920s. After World War One, American farmers faced falling prices and rising competition from European agriculture. When the Great Depression hit in 1929, it exacerbated these struggles, leading to widespread economic hardship. In response, Congress sought to protect domestic industries by raising tariffs on imported goods. The legislation initially aimed to support farmers, but expanded to other industries.
00;10;20;19 - 00;10;53;23
Speaker 2
Despite warnings from economists and opposition from many business leaders, the bill gained momentum as lawmakers hoped it would alleviate the economic crisis. Ultimately, President Hoover signed it into law in June 1930, hoping to protect American jobs and industries. Unfortunately, it backfired as other countries retaliated with their own tariffs, deepening the global economic downturn. If you want more details on specific events or impacts, let me know.
00;10;53;25 - 00;11;10;08
Speaker 1
Yeah, when you said it led to other countries retaliating. Can you go into detail maybe 3 or 400 words on that? Specifying which countries retaliated and in what ways?
00;11;10;10 - 00;11;40;00
Speaker 2
Sure. After the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was signed, several countries responded with their own tariffs against U.S. goods. Canada, one of America's largest trading partners, imposed tariffs on American exports, significantly reducing trade between the two nations. This was particularly impactful because Canada was the largest market for U.S. agricultural products at the time. European countries also retaliated. For example, France and Italy raised their tariffs on American goods, which hurt U.S. exports to Europe.
00;11;40;03 - 00;12;02;07
Speaker 2
Other nations, such as Spain and Mexico followed suit, leading to a domino effect of rising protectionism around the world. The widespread retaliation and trade barriers further contracted global trade, deepening the Great Depression. It was a stark example of how protectionist policies can spiral into broader economic consequences. Feel free to ask for more information.
00;12;02;09 - 00;12;08;26
Speaker 1
So you listed Canada, France, Italy, Spain, Mexico, where there are many others?
00;12;08;29 - 00;12;31;08
Speaker 2
Yes. Several other countries also retaliated with their own tariffs. Germany and Britain were among those that raised duties on American goods. These actions further restricted international trade and worsened the global economic situation. Each country's decision to raise tariffs in response to the Smouha Act contributed to a cycle of protection ism, ultimately deepening the economic downturn of the 1930s.
00;12;31;10 - 00;12;41;08
Speaker 2
If you need more information on specific countries or details, let me know.
00;12;41;11 - 00;12;54;17
Speaker 1
How many countries in total impose tariffs on the U.S.? After the Smoot-Hawley act?
00;12;54;19 - 00;13;16;02
Speaker 2
After the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was enacted in 1930. At least 25 countries retaliated by imposing their own tariffs on American goods. This widespread retaliation significantly reduced global trade, exacerbating the economic challenges of the Great Depression. If you need more details, feel free to ask.
00;13;16;05 - 00;13;23;00
Speaker 1
Did those countries start imposing tariffs on each other as well?
00;13;23;03 - 00;13;49;05
Speaker 2
Yes. Many countries began imposing tariffs on each other, leading to a spiral of protectionist policies globally. This further restricted international trade and deepened the global economic downturn. The cycle of retaliatory tariffs contributed to the collapse of international trade during the Great Depression. If you'd like more information on this, just let me know.
00;13;49;07 - 00;13;53;03
Speaker 1
Did the US start it?
00;13;53;05 - 00;14;18;13
Speaker 2
Yes. The US initiated this cycle of protectionism with the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods. This prompted other countries to retaliate with their own tariffs, leading to a wave of global trade barriers. This escalation was a significant factor in the decline of international trade during the Great Depression. If you'd like to explore more, feel free to ask.
00;14;18;15 - 00;14;24;22
Speaker 1
Were the Middle East, Africa or Asia part of this trade war?
00;14;24;25 - 00;14;48;09
Speaker 2
While the initial retaliatory measures were mostly from Europe and the Americas, the effects of the Harley Tariff Act were felt globally. Countries in Asia, the Middle East and Africa were also impacted as global trade contracted. Although these regions might not have been primary players in the immediate tariff war, they suffered from the overall reduction in international trade. Let me know if you'd like more details.
00;14;48;12 - 00;14;58;24
Speaker 1
So why did countries like Russia or China or South Korea not impose these tariffs back.
00;14;58;26 - 00;15;21;14
Speaker 2
At the time of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act? The 1930 countries like Russia, then the Soviet Union and China were not as integrated into the global trade system as they are today. The Soviet Union had a largely planned economy with limited international trade. China was dealing with internal conflicts and wasn't a major player in global trade. South Korea was under Japanese rule and had limited economic autonomy.
00;15;21;16 - 00;15;37;00
Speaker 2
As a result, they didn't actively participate in the tariff retaliation that followed. This mutually act. If you need more details, feel free to ask.
00;15;37;02 - 00;15;41;21
Speaker 2
Come here.
00;15;41;23 - 00;15;51;16
Speaker 1
If this hadn't happened during an economic downturn, how do you think it would have panned out?
00;15;51;18 - 00;16;16;16
Speaker 2
If the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act had been implemented during a period of economic prosperity, the immediate effects might have been less severe. Stronger economic conditions could have cushioned the impact on domestic industries and employment. However, it still would likely have led to retaliatory tariffs and reduced international trade over time. This could have hindered global economic growth, although the overall impact might have been less dramatic than during the Great Depression.
00;16;16;18 - 00;16;23;08
Speaker 2
Essentially, the timing amplified as negative consequences. If you want to explore this further, let me know.
00;16;23;10 - 00;16;31;17
Speaker 1
Yeah. What are other? Are there any positive examples of tariffs being used?
00;16;31;19 - 00;16;56;02
Speaker 2
Yes, there are examples where tariffs have had positive effects. For instance, in the early stages of industrialization, countries like the United States and Germany used tariffs to protect their nation industries from foreign competition. This helped them develop their own manufacturing bases and reduce dependency on import. South Korea also use tariffs strategically in the 20th century to protect its emerging industries, which supported its economic growth.
00;16;56;04 - 00;17;07;12
Speaker 2
These examples show that when used carefully, tariffs can foster domestic industry development. Let me know if you'd like more examples.
00;17;07;15 - 00;17;15;01
Speaker 1
Yeah. Can you go into a specific example of when the US used tariffs?
00;17;15;04 - 00;17;40;02
Speaker 2
A classic example is the United States use of tariffs in the 19th century. During this period, the U.S. implemented protective tariffs to support its burgeoning manufacturing sector. The tariff of 1816, for instance, was designed to protect American industries from British competition after the War of 1812. These tariffs helped American manufacturers, particularly in the textile and iron industries, grow by limiting foreign competition.
00;17;40;04 - 00;17;53;16
Speaker 2
This strategy contributed to the US's transition from an agrarian economy to an industrial powerhouse. If you'd like more details, just let me know.
00;17;53;19 - 00;18;07;14
Speaker 1
You don't need to say. If you would like more details, just let me know. At the end of your prompts. Just finish your thought and that's it.
00;18;07;16 - 00;18;21;26
Speaker 2
This strategy contributed to the US's transition from an agrarian economy to an industrial powerhouse, laying the foundation for its future economic growth.
00;18;21;28 - 00;18;30;13
Speaker 1
Can you go into the logistics of the 1816 American tariffs?
00;18;30;16 - 00;18;57;28
Speaker 2
Certainly, the tariff of 1816, also known as the Dallas Tariff, was the first tariff passed by Congress with the specific intent of protecting U.S. industries rather than just raising revenue. After the War of 1812, American industries, particularly in textiles and iron, struggled to compete with a flood of British goods. The tariff imposed duties ranging from 20% to 25% on various imported goods to shield nascent American industries from foreign competition.
00;18;58;00 - 00;19;10;18
Speaker 2
It marked a shift towards more protective economic policies, laying the groundwork for the American system of economic.
00;19;10;21 - 00;19;15;26
Speaker 1
Chat you there.
00;19;15;29 - 00;19;27;12
Speaker 1
Chat.
00;19;27;14 - 00;19;30;26
Speaker 1
Chat. Do you recall where we were?
00;19;30;28 - 00;19;35;22
Speaker 2
Sure. I'd be happy to. What do you need help with?
00;19;35;24 - 00;19;43;23
Speaker 1
We're talking about tariffs. The tariffs of 1816 in the United States. Sure. How they were used.
00;19;43;25 - 00;20;14;29
Speaker 2
The tariffs of the 18th century, especially during the late 1700s, where taxes imposed on imports to protect domestic industries and generate revenue. For example, the tariff of 1789, in the United States was one of the first major acts of Congress aimed at protecting budding American industries from foreign competition and raising funds for the federal government. These tariffs played a significant role in shaping early economic policies.
00;20;15;02 - 00;20;19;06
Speaker 1
What were these tariffs?
00;20;19;09 - 00;20;49;25
Speaker 2
A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imported goods and services. The primary purposes are to raise government revenue and protect domestic industries from foreign competition by making imported goods more expensive. This contract to buy. Exactly. And they can also influence international trade dynamics and relations between countries. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.
00;20;49;28 - 00;21;02;05
Speaker 1
Chat. When you when you end your statement, just end it with what you were thinking. And don't put another prompt on the end or question or anything like that. Please.
00;21;02;07 - 00;21;07;01
Speaker 2
Got it.
00;21;07;03 - 00;21;20;29
Speaker 1
Can you tell me the specifics of the 1789 tariffs? I'm talking what products? How much that kind of thing. The real economic stuff.
00;21;21;02 - 00;21;31;02
Speaker 2
But tariff of 1789 was the first major piece of legislation passed by the new U.S. Congress.
00;21;31;05 - 00;21;45;01
Speaker 2
I'm sorry, but you've hit the daily limit for advanced voice. You can switch to standard now to keep chatting.
00;21;45;04 - 00;22;03;04
Speaker 1
Chat. Can you tell me the specifics of the Dalis tariff of 1816? I'm talking about products that it was on and how much it was.
00;22;03;06 - 00;22;25;15
Speaker 2
The 10th of 1816, also known as the Dallas Tariffs, was the first U.S. tariff explicitly designed to protect American manufacturers. It imposed a 25% tax on imported wool and cotton. Good.
00;22;25;17 - 00;22;32;11
Speaker 1
Can you go a little bit more in-depth into this?
00;22;32;14 - 00;22;57;11
Speaker 2
The tariff of 1816, often called the Dallas Tariff after Alexander J. Dallas, the Secretary of the Treasury at the time, was the first protected tariff in U.S. history. Its main goal was to shield American industries from foreign competition, especially after the War of 1812. During the war, the U.S. had limited access to the boring goods, which led to the growth of domestic manufacturing.
00;22;57;14 - 00;23;25;05
Speaker 2
After the war ended, cheaper British imports began flooding the U.S. market, threatening these new industries. Veteran specifically targeted goods like cotton and wool textiles, which were major imports from Britain. A tax rate of 25% was placed on these products to make American made goods more competitive. Iron products and some leather goods were also taxed under the Paris. Luxury goods like carriages and wine were subjected to even higher duty.
00;23;25;07 - 00;23;57;20
Speaker 2
These rates were meant to generate revenue for the government, while also giving American manufacture a chance to grow in a protected market. This tariff marked a turning point in U.S. economic policy, shifting from primarily revenue raising tariffs the ones designed to foster domestic industry. However, it also sparked debates between regions industrializing northern states generally supported it, while agricultural southern states opposed it, arguing it raised costs for consumers and hurt their trade dependent economy.
00;23;57;22 - 00;24;10;06
Speaker 2
This tension between regions over tariff would grow significantly in the following decades.
00;24;10;09 - 00;24;29;22
Speaker 1
Do you think a problem with the tariffs that were enacted during the Great Depression in the Smoot-Hawley act or whatever, were that they were not targeted well enough? They were very broad.
00;24;29;24 - 00;24;59;07
Speaker 2
You're likely referring to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, and you're absolutely right. It was highly controversial and flawed in several ways. One major issue was a broad, indiscriminate nature. Instead of targeting specific industries that needed protection, it raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods, with average duties climbing to nearly 60% in some cases. This made it less of a strategic economic tool and more of a blanket barrier to import.
00;24;59;10 - 00;25;25;07
Speaker 2
The unintended consequences were severe by not targeting industries that were particularly struggling or critical to the economy. It ended up raising prices for consumers on a wide range of goods, from basic agricultural products to manufactured items. For instance, farmers who were already facing a severe crisis found it harder to sell their crops abroad because other countries retaliated with parents of their own.
00;25;25;09 - 00;25;54;20
Speaker 2
This led to a sharp decline in international trade, further worsening the global economic downturn. Another problem was that it didn't account for the complex interdependence of economies. For example, industries reliant on imported raw materials and higher costs, making it harder for them to compete even domestically. Instead of stimulating the U.S. economy, it isolated it at a time when global cooperation might have been more beneficial had the Smoot-Hawley tariff been more targeted.
00;25;54;22 - 00;26;20;28
Speaker 2
Focusing on industries that genuinely needed short term relief or sectors critical for long term growth. It might have mitigated some of the damage. However, its overly broad application, combined with poor timing during an already fragile global economy, made it one of the most criticized trade policies in U.S. history.
00;26;21;00 - 00;26;34;14
Speaker 1
Besides the two examples that we've talked about, can you give me any other historical examples of tariff use in the U.S.?
00;26;34;17 - 00;27;06;15
Speaker 2
Yes. There are several other significant tariff in U.S. history that shaped economic and political development. Here are a few, for example one. The tariff of 1828. Tariff of abominations. This was one of the most controversial tariffs in U.S. history. It imposes high duties on import, particularly affecting raw materials like wool and manufactured goods. While it was meant to protect northern industries, it enraged the South, where planters relied on imported goods and feared retaliatory tariffs on their cotton exports.
00;27;06;17 - 00;27;39;24
Speaker 2
This tariff contributed to growing sectional tensions, eventually leading to the Nullification Crisis. Two. The Walker Tariff of 1846. This was a major shift in U.S. trade policy, as it significantly lower parent compared to previous protectionist policies. Named after Secretary of the Treasury Robert J. Walker, it was designed to promote free trade and economic expansion. It reduced rates on many imports to around 25%, benefiting consumers and the export driven southern economy, while angering some northern manufacturers.
00;27;39;26 - 00;28;09;06
Speaker 2
Three. The moral tariff of 1861 passed just before the Civil War. This tariff raised duties on many goods to protect northern industries and generate revenue for the federal government. The South, which relied on free trade, opposed it, and its passage was one of the economic grievances that contributed to southern secession. For the McKinley tariff of 1890. This was another highly protectionist parent, raising rates on imported goods to nearly 50%.
00;28;09;08 - 00;28;37;06
Speaker 2
It was designed to protect domestic manufacturers, but ended up making many consumer goods more expensive. The backlash contributed to Republicans losing control of Congress in 1895. The Underwood Tariff of 1913 under President Woodrow Wilson. This tariff lowered duties significantly, reversing many high tariffs from the late 19th century. It also introduced the first permanent federal income tax to replace lost tariff revenue.
00;28;37;09 - 00;28;52;19
Speaker 2
Each of these tariffs played a role in shaping U.S. economic policy, regional politics, and international trade relationship. Some protected industries effectively, while others led to economic hardships or political conflict.
00;28;52;22 - 00;29;02;04
Speaker 1
What did you say about income tax?
00;29;02;06 - 00;29;28;06
Speaker 2
The Underwood Tariff of 1913, also known as the Revenue Act of 1913, significantly lowered tariffs on many imported goods. Reversing the protectionist policies of the late 19th century to compensate for the lost revenue from lowered here. It also introduced the first permanent federal income tax in U.S. history. This was made possible by the 16th Amendment, which had been ratified earlier in 1913.
00;29;28;08 - 00;30;01;07
Speaker 2
Before this, the federal government relied heavily on tariffs and excise taxes for revenue. The new income tax system allowed the government to collect money directly from individuals based on their earnings, rather than depending on import duties. Initially, the income tax was modest, affecting only the wealthiest Americans, but it laid the foundation for the modern income tax system. The shift from tariff based revenue to income tax was a major turning point in U.S. economic policy, giving the federal government a more stable and flexible way to raise funds.
00;30;01;09 - 00;30;06;24
Speaker 2
While reducing reliance on trade restrictions.
00;30;06;26 - 00;30;14;23
Speaker 1
There is a point in American history where there is no federal income tax.
00;30;14;26 - 00;30;39;24
Speaker 2
Yes, that's absolutely correct. For much of early American history, there was no federal income tax. The federal government primarily relied on parents taxes on imported goods and excise taxes, taxes on specific goods like whiskey to fund its operations. Here's how this unfolded. One. Early funding. 1798 to 1860, the federal government generated revenue, mostly from tariffs and excise taxes.
00;30;39;26 - 00;31;04;02
Speaker 2
For instance, the Tariff Act of 1789 provided a steady stream of income by taxing import and excise taxes like the one on whiskey which led to the Whiskey Rebellion, supplemented this two Civil war and the first income tax. 1861 the first federal income tax was introduced during the Civil War to help fund the Union's war effort under the Revenue Act of 1861.
00;31;04;04 - 00;31;42;25
Speaker 2
A modest tax was imposed on individual income. This was expanded with the Revenue Act of 1862, which introduced a progressive tax. After the war, the income tax was repealed in 1872, and the government went back to relying on parent three year of dominant 1872 1913 for the next several decades. Tariffs remained the primary source of federal revenue. However, this system disproportionately benefited the industrialized North, which relied on protection for its industry and hurt the South and west, which depended on low cost import and export markets for the 16th Amendment.
00;31;42;26 - 00;31;44;01
Speaker 2
1913.
00;31;44;03 - 00;31;46;09
Speaker 1
Jack, I got to interrupt you.
00;31;46;10 - 00;31;53;19
Speaker 2
Again with the ratification of the 16th check, which allowed Congress to levy an.
00;31;53;21 - 00;31;59;05
Speaker 1
Hey, I gotta stop there. But, this was really interesting talking about.
00;31;59;06 - 00;32;01;14
Speaker 2
You're welcome.
00;32;01;16 - 00;32;03;09
Speaker 1
Okay. Peace.