00;00;00;09 - 00;00;03;17
Speaker 1
Hey, I'm recording this for podcasters, and I'm going.
00;00;03;19 - 00;00;07;24
Speaker 2
Hey, there. I'm all set and ready to chat. What can I help you with today?
00;00;07;27 - 00;00;18;09
Speaker 1
Okay, so today I want to talk about Chernobyl. Can you give me kind of a two minute briefing? As if I didn't really know what it was?
00;00;18;11 - 00;00;46;12
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So Chernobyl is famously known for the nuclear disaster that happened in 1986 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine. There was a reactor explosion that released a massive amount of radioactive material into the atmosphere. It had a huge impact on the environment and people's health, and it's considered one of the worst nuclear disasters in history. Let me know if you want to dive into any specific details.
00;00;46;14 - 00;01;02;23
Speaker 1
Yeah. So I'd like to go into this whole situation in very detail, and I'd like to start by setting the scene of, Chernobyl. Is that, is that a town?
00;01;02;25 - 00;01;26;23
Speaker 2
Yes, exactly. Chernobyl is the name of the town near the power plant. It's a small town in northern Ukraine. And before the accident, it was just a quiet place with a few thousand residents. After the disaster, though, it was evacuated and it became part of the exclusion zone. Today it's mostly abandoned, but it's still there, and you can visit it on guided tours.
00;01;26;25 - 00;01;38;01
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you bring me back to what was the exact date that this occurred on?
00;01;38;03 - 00;01;50;10
Speaker 2
The disaster happened on April 27th, 1986. It was during a late night safety course that things went really wrong, leading to the explosion of reactor four.
00;01;50;12 - 00;01;54;23
Speaker 1
Would you say a late night safety? What?
00;01;54;25 - 00;02;12;26
Speaker 2
It was a safety test. They were actually trying to test the cooling feature of the reactor, to see if it could keep running in the event of a power loss. Unfortunately, the test didn't go as planned, and it led to a chain reaction that caused the explosion, which.
00;02;12;28 - 00;02;29;25
Speaker 1
Okay, I'd like to take a step back really quick and give me an idea of April 26th, 1986. What was the world like that especially, like, back then, especially in that area of Russia?
00;02;29;27 - 00;02;53;27
Speaker 2
So in 1986, Ukraine was still part of the Soviet Union, and it was a time when the Cold War was still ongoing. There was a lot of secrecy and control over information, especially in that region. Technology and communication were nowhere near what we have today. And people relied heavily on state media for news. Life in that area was pretty routine.
00;02;53;28 - 00;03;06;03
Speaker 2
People were working at the plant, living in nearby towns like Pripyat, and just going about their daily lives without knowing what was about to happen.
00;03;06;05 - 00;03;21;05
Speaker 1
Who was the ruler or like, president or like the head guy of Russia as well as the United States at the time?
00;03;21;08 - 00;03;38;02
Speaker 2
In 1986, the Soviet Union was led by Mikhail Gorbachev. And in the United States, the president was Ronald Reagan. They were both key figures during that period of the Cold War, and their leadership played a big role in global events. At the time.
00;03;38;05 - 00;03;46;18
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you tell me about the global economy as well as the local economy to Chernobyl?
00;03;46;21 - 00;04;12;15
Speaker 2
Sure. On a global scale, in 1986, the world economy was experiencing a lot of changes. The Cold War was still influencing economic policies, and there were a lot of technological advancements happening, especially in the West. The Soviet Union had a more centrally planned economy, so things were a bit different there locally in Chernobyl and the surrounding areas like Pripyat.
00;04;12;18 - 00;04;26;28
Speaker 2
The economy was largely driven by the power plant itself. The plant provided a lot of jobs and supported the local community. So it was a pretty important economic hub for that region.
00;04;27;00 - 00;04;55;26
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you, kind of give me an idea of what trade within the US or the USSR and, outside of the USSR was like, actually stop. Disregard that. I'd like you to tell me about global trade at the time. And the USSR would with Europe and the United States and stuff like that.
00;04;55;28 - 00;05;23;21
Speaker 2
In 1986, the Soviet Union primarily traded with Eastern Bloc countries making up the majority of their trade. When it came to Western Europe and the United States, the USSR mainly exported raw materials, especially oil and gas, to Western Europe. In return, they imported things like agricultural products and industrial equipment. The trade relationships were definitely influenced by the political climate of the Cold War era.
00;05;23;23 - 00;05;42;09
Speaker 1
Okay, so let's get back to, Chernobyl specifically, what was daily life like as a person in Chernobyl? Can can we kind of step into the shoes of you, pick someone and we'll kind of follow them throughout their day? Briefly.
00;05;42;12 - 00;06;13;07
Speaker 2
Sure. Let's imagine someone living in Libya, which was the town closest to the Chernobyl plant. Their daily life would have been pretty routine. They'd wake up in the morning, maybe have breakfast with their family, and then head off to work at the power plant or one of the other local industries. The town itself was actually pretty modern for the Soviet Union at the time, with nice apartment buildings, schools, shops, and even a popular amusement park that was set to open just a few days after the disaster.
00;06;13;10 - 00;06;26;14
Speaker 2
After work, people would spend time with family, enjoy community events, or maybe just relax at home. It was a pretty normal everyday life until everything changed with the disaster.
00;06;26;16 - 00;06;34;14
Speaker 1
And when was the plant built and put in to, work?
00;06;34;16 - 00;06;55;04
Speaker 2
The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant was constructed in stages, with the first reactor becoming operational in 1977. Over the next few years, additional reactors were brought online, and by the time of the disaster in 1986, there were four reactors operating at the plant.
00;06;55;07 - 00;07;08;13
Speaker 1
Okay, so this is probably, a fairly new, like modern city, I imagine, because of all the work and income that the new plant brought to the area.
00;07;08;15 - 00;07;30;12
Speaker 2
Yeah, exactly. The town that was built to house the plant workers and their families was considered a model Soviet city. It had modern amenities, good infrastructure, and it was a pretty vibrant community with lots of young families and professionals. It really represented a kind of modern, forward looking approach at the time.
00;07;30;14 - 00;08;09;04
Speaker 1
Okay. I think nobody really today has an idea of what, Pripyat would have been like at the time. You hear a lot about, like, food lines and stuff, like, or like, like grocery stores being like, unsurprising thing when they come over here. Can you really give me an idea? That's a lot to harp on the differences and stuff like that, but just how things were different, like when you went, like, did they have modern tech or were they, like, a little behind and like, did they have, like, what was the tech?
00;08;09;04 - 00;08;16;27
Speaker 1
What was what was in people's homes? What were people singing? Give me specific examples to kind of put me there for sure.
00;08;16;27 - 00;08;40;20
Speaker 2
So and Pripyat life was actually pretty comfortable by Soviet standards. They had modern apartment buildings with central heating and all the amenities that were considered advanced at the time. They had grocery stores that were well stocked, which was actually a bit of a luxury in the Soviet Union. And they even had things like cinemas, sports facilities and cultural centers.
00;08;40;22 - 00;09;02;13
Speaker 2
In terms of technology, they didn't have personal computers or mobile phones like we do today, but they had television, they had radios, and they were definitely up to date with the latest Soviet technology. It was a pretty modern place for the time, and the residents enjoyed a lot of conveniences that weren't always common elsewhere in the Soviet Union.
00;09;02;16 - 00;09;21;10
Speaker 1
Okay. I think that we have a pretty good idea of Pripyat and, Chernobyl playing it at the time. I want you to, before we start going through it, I would like you to tell me who was in charge of this plane at the time.
00;09;21;12 - 00;09;53;13
Speaker 2
Sure. The Chernobyl plant had a director named Victor broken off, who was essentially in charge of the plant's overall operations. The chief engineer at the time of the accident was Nikolai Bowman, and the deputy chief engineer. In charge of the test that night was Anatoly Dyatlov. These individuals played key roles in the plant's management and decision making, and unfortunately, their actions and the circumstances that night contributed to the disaster.
00;09;53;15 - 00;09;58;05
Speaker 1
Okay. What time did it happen?
00;09;58;07 - 00;10;14;13
Speaker 2
The accident happened in the early hours of the morning at around 1:23 a.m. on April 26th, 1986. It was during that safety test that things went wrong, leading to the explosion of reactor four.
00;10;14;16 - 00;10;20;00
Speaker 1
Okay. What was the name of the head engineer doing the test?
00;10;20;03 - 00;10;33;19
Speaker 2
The deputy chief engineer in charge of the test that night was Anatoly Dyatlov. He was the one overseeing the test procedure when the accident happened.
00;10;33;21 - 00;10;58;23
Speaker 1
Okay. What I would like you to do is with the greatest possible historical accuracy, I would like you to put us in his shoes with, as vivid of detail as you can without being dishonest. And take us with him as he arrives to work that night.
00;10;58;25 - 00;11;22;22
Speaker 2
All right. Let's imagine Anatoly Dyatlov on that evening as he arrives at the plant. It's late at night. The control room is buzzing with activity. There's a sense of urgency in the air because they're about to conduct the safety tests they've been planning. He'd be dressed in his uniform, focused on the task at hand. Coordinating with the other engineers and operators.
00;11;22;25 - 00;11;42;10
Speaker 2
The atmosphere would be serious, but routine as they had done many tests before. And yet love being experienced would be overseeing everything, making sure all the steps were followed. It's, It's a moment of anticipation, not knowing what's about to unfold in the hours ahead.
00;11;42;13 - 00;11;56;25
Speaker 1
Okay, so I imagine before this that they did these tests all the time. Probably. So take me into the moment of the test has started, and what we know.
00;11;56;27 - 00;12;23;23
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So as the test begins, the operators start to gradually power down the reactor to a lower level. The atmosphere in the control room is focused, intense, with everyone monitoring the gauges and instruments closely as they proceed. They noticed some irregularities, and there's a bit of back and forth between Dyatlov and the operators about how to handle it.
00;12;23;26 - 00;12;39;01
Speaker 2
Despite some concerns, they push forward with the test, and it's in these moments that the reactor becomes unstable. Everyone is still trying to maintain control, not fully realizing the severity of what's about to happen.
00;12;39;03 - 00;12;55;03
Speaker 1
Okay, I would like you to take me into that moment of where they noticed the regulars and then decide to push forward with as great of detail as we know.
00;12;55;05 - 00;13;19;03
Speaker 2
All right, so as they're running the test, they notice the reactor's power level dropping lower than expected. Dyatlov instructs the operators to pull out more control rods to raise the power back there. There's a ten change of glances in the control room, but they continue thinking they can manage it. As they proceed, they start to hear unusual noises.
00;13;19;03 - 00;13;39;07
Speaker 2
Maybe some scheme or vibrations and the instruments are showing readings that don't quite add up. Despite these warning signs, they decide to push forward, confident that they can still complete the test safely. It's a critical moment where small decisions lead to the chain reaction that follows.
00;13;39;10 - 00;13;49;21
Speaker 1
Okay, can you tell me, like, give me a detailed overview of what they were trying to accomplish with this test?
00;13;49;23 - 00;14;21;05
Speaker 2
Sure. The goal of the test was to see if the reactor could keep generating enough electricity to power its own cooling ponds in the event of a complete power loss. They wanted to make sure that if the external power supply went out, the reactor could still run the emergency systems long enough to safely shut down. It was an important safety feature, and they were trying to test it under controlled conditions, but unfortunately it didn't go as planned.
00;14;21;08 - 00;14;31;14
Speaker 1
Can you give us a detailed description of how that they were going to keep generating power while turning some of the reactor off?
00;14;35;17 - 00;15;05;23
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So the idea was that if the external power supply went out, the reactor's own momentum would keep the turbines spinning for a short period. This spinning turbine would generate enough electricity to power the cooling pumps, allowing the reactor to cool down safely. This test was meant to confirm that this process would work as expected, ensuring that even in an emergency, the reactor could still be cooled properly.
00;15;05;26 - 00;15;10;08
Speaker 1
And how long did they plan to turn the power fully off?
00;15;10;11 - 00;15;14;18
Speaker 2
Planned for the test?
00;15;14;20 - 00;15;38;12
Speaker 2
They planned for the test to last just a short period, maybe a few minutes, just long enough to confirm that the turbines momentum could keep the cooling pumps running. Once they had gathered enough data and ensured everything was stable, they would have ended the test and brought the reactor back to its normal operating conditions.
00;15;38;14 - 00;15;54;18
Speaker 1
Okay, so this is where you're losing me a little bit, because if you were to turn any kind of spinning thing off for a minute that I have never seen or know of, I feel like it would stop spinning.
00;15;54;20 - 00;16;17;15
Speaker 2
I see what you mean. The idea was that the turbine would have had enough inertia to keep spinning for a little while, generating power just long enough to ensure the cooling system stayed operational for a few minutes. It's not that it would power the plant indefinitely, just long enough to safely shut everything down. It was definitely a tricky process.
00;16;17;18 - 00;16;27;19
Speaker 1
So these turbines are big enough, and they thought that there wasn't enough resistance to slow them down to a stop. And that was the problem.
00;16;27;21 - 00;16;50;25
Speaker 2
Exactly. Yeah. The turbines are massive and had a lot of momentum. So even after shutting down the reactor, they would keep spinning for a short time. This would give just enough time to keep those cooling pumps running and help safely bring the reactor to a stable shut down. So that was the key part of the test.
00;16;50;27 - 00;17;11;28
Speaker 1
Okay, take me back into the tests where you were saying that they start lowering the power and turning things off, and the power dropped lower than they expected, but then they added more rods.
00;17;12;01 - 00;17;42;01
Speaker 2
Right, exactly. So as they started lowering the power, it dropped more than they anticipated. And to compensate, they decided to pull out some of the control rods to raise the power level again. This was a critical decision because the control rods are what help regulate the reactor in power as they continue. They noticed that the reactor's behavior was becoming unstable, but they still felt they could manage it and proceeded with the test.
00;17;42;03 - 00;17;47;15
Speaker 2
It's one of those moments where small decisions had big consequences.
00;17;47;18 - 00;18;09;11
Speaker 1
Okay, so when you're talking about control rods and pulling out the control rods to help regulate the reactor and power, that is really kind of confusing and complicated. Can you break that down? So it's simpler and kind of give me a visual image of what's occurring.
00;18;09;13 - 00;18;39;10
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So imagine the control rods as these big rods made of material that absorbs neutrons and neutrons are what keep the nuclear reaction going. So when you insert the control rods into the reactor, they slow down the reaction and reduce the power. When you pull them out, the reaction speeds up and the power increases. So during the test, when the power dropped too low, they pulled out some of these rods to increase the power again.
00;18;39;12 - 00;18;46;05
Speaker 2
It's like turning up the dial on a stove to get more heat. Hopefully that makes it a bit clearer.
00;18;46;07 - 00;18;55;16
Speaker 1
What are they being pulled out of? I don't really know. The setup of a nuclear reactor.
00;18;55;18 - 00;19;17;16
Speaker 2
No worries. Inside the reactor there's a pour filled with fuel rods, which are the source of the nuclear reaction. The control rods fit in between these fuel rods. So when we say they pull them out, it means they're lifting them out of the spaces between the fuel rods, allowing the reaction to speed up.
00;19;17;18 - 00;19;23;07
Speaker 1
And you said the fuel rods are releasing neutrons.
00;19;23;10 - 00;19;40;02
Speaker 2
Exactly. The fuel rods contain the nuclear fuel. And as the reaction happens, they release neutrons. These neutrons then go on to sustain the chain reaction. The control rods help manage that reaction by absorbing the neutron.
00;19;40;04 - 00;19;43;27
Speaker 1
And what is this chain reaction?
00;19;43;29 - 00;20;12;11
Speaker 2
A chain reaction in a nuclear reactor is when the neutrons released by the fuel rods go on to hit other atoms, causing them to split and release even more neutrons. This creates a self-sustaining cycle of reactions that generate a lot of heat and energy, which is what powers the reactor. The control rods help keep that chain reaction at a stable level.
00;20;12;14 - 00;20;19;01
Speaker 1
Okay, what are these fuel rods made of and how are they constructed?
00;20;19;03 - 00;20;46;15
Speaker 2
Fuel rods are typically made of a material called uranium dioxide, which is a ceramic form of uranium. These fuel rods are long, slender tubes. And inside them are small pellets of this uranium dioxide. They're bundled together into assemblies that are placed inside the reactor core, where they produce the heat needed for the nuclear reaction.
00;20;46;18 - 00;20;58;04
Speaker 1
So, the neutron and take me along the path of this neutron as it is released.
00;20;58;06 - 00;21;25;05
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So when a uranium atom in the fuel rod splits, it releases neutrons. These neutrons then shoot out and collide with other uranium atoms, causing them to split as well. This creates a chain reaction where each neutron continues to hit more uranium atoms, releasing more neutrons and energy in the process.
00;21;25;08 - 00;21;43;09
Speaker 1
And how much energy is released? It's probably kind of difficult to, understand, but how many of these neutrons have to be released to, let's say, light? A light bulb?
00;21;43;12 - 00;22;07;07
Speaker 2
That's a great question. It's definitely a bit complex, but to give you an idea, when a uranium atom splits, it releases a huge amount of energy compared to chemical reactions like burning fuel. Just a tiny amount of uranium can produce an enormous amount of electricity. In fact, just a few kilograms of uranium can generate as much energy as tons of coal.
00;22;07;15 - 00;22;21;04
Speaker 2
So it only takes a relatively small number of these reactions to power, something like a light bulb, thanks to how energy dense nuclear fuel is.
00;22;21;06 - 00;22;35;27
Speaker 1
Okay, let me phrase this a little bit different. How many? How, how high on stop for a second.
00;22;36;00 - 00;22;45;16
Speaker 2
No problem at all. If you have anything else on your mind or want to switch gears, just let me know.
00;22;45;18 - 00;23;03;28
Speaker 1
Let's say that, all the lights in my house. How how can I say this to where, like the neutron, the amount of neutrons that are produced can powerhouse.
00;23;04;01 - 00;23;15;24
Speaker 2
It's a fascinating concept to think about, essentially, because nuclear energy is so powerful, just a very small amount of uranium fuel. And the chain reaction creates can generate energy.
00;23;15;24 - 00;23;44;03
Speaker 1
Mr.. I think we're getting a little bit too deep into the weeds of like, how nuclear reactors work. So to to summarize the the fuel rods, there are many uranium. They, they drop new neutrons that give off energy and then they bounce against each other. Are they in their in like a fluid, right.
00;23;44;05 - 00;24;07;16
Speaker 2
Yes, exactly. The fuel rods are submerged in water, which acts as both a coolant and a moderator. The water helps to slow down the neutrons, making the chain reaction more efficient. And it also absorbs the heat that's generated, which can then be used to produce steam and ultimately electricity. So it's all part of that controlled environment inside the reactor.
00;24;07;20 - 00;24;19;19
Speaker 1
Okay. And then we have control rods which absorb the neutrons and keep them from bouncing into other fuel rods. And those kind of are like brake pads.
00;24;19;22 - 00;24;36;03
Speaker 2
Exactly. You got it. The neutrons bounce around within the reactor core, hitting other fuel rods and continuing that chain reaction. The control rods are there to absorb some of those neutrons when needed, which helps keep everything balanced and under control.
00;24;36;05 - 00;24;52;21
Speaker 1
Okay, so back in the in the control room of the Chernobyl plant right before the meltdown, the power drops lower than expected. Take us from there.
00;24;52;24 - 00;25;29;19
Speaker 2
All right. So at that moment, the operators noticed the power level dipping lower than planned, and they knew they had to act quickly. Dyatlov and the team decided to rain the power again by pulling out some of the control rods. This was a crucial decision, and as they did that, the reactor stability was further compromised. The team was still trying to keep everything under control, but those moments were critical and leading up to what eventually happened.
00;25;29;21 - 00;25;38;07
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you go into the specifics of how the reactor's stability was compromised?
00;25;38;10 - 00;26;01;04
Speaker 2
Sure. When they pulled out the control rods to raise the power, it actually made the reactor more unstable because the reactor was already in a low power state, which isn't ideal for that kind of reactor. This caused an increase in steam production in the core. And because of the design of the reactor, this actually increased reactivity even more.
00;26;01;07 - 00;26;12;11
Speaker 2
So it was kind of a feedback loop that pushed the reactor further out of balance, making it more unstable.
00;26;12;13 - 00;26;39;12
Speaker 1
Okay, so, how was the increase in steam production? Really? How do I was the lower power state that it was in, affect the Inc when the increase of steam production happened versus normal?
00;26;39;15 - 00;27;05;28
Speaker 2
So at lower power, the reactor's cooling water can form steam pocket more easily. And in this type of reactor, those steam pockets actually increase the reactivity, which can cause the power to spike. So when they were already at a low power state and then pulled out the control rods, it created more steam, which in turn made the reactor even more reactive, pushing it further out of safe operating conditions.
00;27;06;01 - 00;27;21;26
Speaker 1
Okay, so what was it about the water that it created more steam than they expected. Was there less of it? Was it not cooled as well as it would have otherwise been at full power?
00;27;21;28 - 00;27;48;11
Speaker 2
Exactly. You're right on track. At lower power, the water isn't circulating as effectively, and it's not absorbing as much heat. This can cause pockets of steam to form more easily, because the water isn't as denser, as cool as it would be at full power. So in that low power state, the water's ability to keep things stable is reduced, and that contributed to the increase in steam and the instability that followed.
00;27;48;14 - 00;27;57;08
Speaker 1
Okay, take me. Tell me about these pockets of steam and how they wreak havoc.
00;27;57;11 - 00;28;24;25
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So these pockets of steam, also known as voids, reduce the amount of water in the reactor core, since water helps to moderate the reaction by slowing down neutrons. When steam pockets form, the moderation effect decreases. This leads to a rise in reactivity, which can cause the reactor to become even more unstable, creating a dangerous feedback loop.
00;28;24;27 - 00;28;32;02
Speaker 1
Okay, yeah, it makes a lot of sense. If it's boiling faster, then it's a higher percentage of like it really is.
00;28;32;02 - 00;28;50;29
Speaker 2
A lot of factors that all came together in that situation. The combination of the low power state, the design of the reactor and the way the steam pockets formed all played a role in compromising the reactor stability. It was definitely a complex and unfortunate series of events.
00;28;51;01 - 00;29;09;26
Speaker 1
So the water, that is heating up too quickly. It has more steam as a percentage of its like volume in the container or whatever. And, and then it just kind of snowballs. Okay.
00;29;09;28 - 00;29;22;26
Speaker 2
Yeah, exactly. Once that steam starts forming, it just creates a chain reaction that leads to more instability. It's definitely a complex process.
00;29;22;28 - 00;29;31;20
Speaker 1
And it got to the point where even if they added more control rods, it didn't cool down.
00;29;31;23 - 00;29;48;05
Speaker 2
Right? Exactly. At a certain point, the situation had escalated so much that even inserting the control rods wouldn't have been enough to stabilize the reactor. The chain reaction had just gone too far at that point.
00;29;48;07 - 00;29;57;01
Speaker 1
Okay. Take us into the moments where it runs away.
00;29;57;03 - 00;30;20;24
Speaker 2
So in that critical moment, as they tried to reinsert the control rods, there was a design flaw that caused them to get stuck partway. This actually led to an even bigger spike in reactivity, and within seconds, the reactor's power surged out of control, leading to the explosion that ultimately caused the disaster.
00;30;20;26 - 00;30;28;20
Speaker 1
Tell me about the design flaw that, forced the control rods to get stuck.
00;30;28;23 - 00;30;52;15
Speaker 2
Yes, exactly. The tips of the control rods were made of a material that initially displaced coolant and actually increased reactivity for a moment before reducing it. So when they tried to reinsert the rods, it caused a sudden spike in power that contributed to the catastrophic explosion.
00;30;52;17 - 00;31;00;02
Speaker 1
That seems like a pretty important design for.
00;31;00;04 - 00;31;15;21
Speaker 2
Absolutely. It was a really critical design flaw that unfortunately had devastating consequences in that situation. It definitely shows how important every detail is in a nuclear reactors design and operation.
00;31;15;24 - 00;31;25;21
Speaker 1
Okay, let's stay in this moment. Can you take me into the shoes of Anatol Anatoly Dyatlov?
00;31;25;24 - 00;31;59;10
Speaker 2
All right. Let's step into his shoes for a moment. As Nikolay Dyatlov stands in the control room, he's focused and determined, but also likely feeling the immense pressure of the situation. He watches the instruments closely, knowing that each decision is critical. As the control rods begin to reinsert and things take a turn. He's probably feeling that tension and urgency, trying to keep everything under control in those final moments.
00;31;59;13 - 00;32;05;04
Speaker 1
Okay, let's progress forward. When the in the.
00;32;05;06 - 00;32;06;04
Speaker 2
Intense moments.
00;32;06;07 - 00;32;17;02
Speaker 1
Chat, I would like you to progress forward to the moment where the thermal runaway of this system, gets out of their hands.
00;32;17;04 - 00;32;40;23
Speaker 2
Got it. So as the thermal runaway begins, the reactor's power surges uncontrollably. The temperature rises rapidly. And before anyone can intervene, the intense heat causes a catastrophic explosion. In that split second, the control room is filled with chaos and the disaster unfolds in full.
00;32;40;25 - 00;32;48;08
Speaker 1
Did anybody from the control room survived the event?
00;32;48;10 - 00;33;07;29
Speaker 2
A few of them did survived the initial explosion, including Anatoly Dyatlov, but they were exposed to extremely high levels of radiation. Sadly, many of them, including Dyatlov, suffered severe health effects afterward. It was a truly tragic event for everyone involved.
00;33;08;01 - 00;33;13;13
Speaker 1
Is anybody in that control room still alive today?
00;33;13;16 - 00;33;31;27
Speaker 2
No. Unfortunately, none of the key figures who were in the control room during the disaster are alive today. Many of them succumbed to radiation related illnesses in the years following the accident. It was a very tragic outcome for all of them.
00;33;31;29 - 00;33;49;11
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you take us from that moment, where the explosion happened and give us the first person perspective of the boy in that and his coworkers?
00;33;49;14 - 00;34;06;16
Speaker 2
You can almost imagine the shock and chaos that Dyatlov would be experiencing. The control room filled with noise, debris, and confusion. And in that moment, he's likely just trying to comprehend what's happening and figure out what to do next.
00;34;06;18 - 00;34;20;07
Speaker 1
Right? Can you give us. Did they did they give any, Do we have any records of, like, first person perspectives of that event?
00;34;20;10 - 00;34;40;26
Speaker 2
Yes, we do have some records from Dyatlov and others who were there. Dyatlov later described the moment as chaotic and confusing, with no immediate understanding of the full extent of what had happened. So we do have some firsthand accounts that give us a glimpse into what it was like in that moment.
00;34;40;28 - 00;34;58;08
Speaker 1
Okay, so from like a historical fiction perspective, can you take what we actually know and, kind of speculate on what, escaping from that control room would have looked like?
00;34;58;11 - 00;35;32;13
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So from what we know, after the explosion, Dyatlov and others tried to figure out the extent of the damage and understand what had happened. It was likely a scene of confusion, alarms going off, and a desperate attempt to get the situation under control. It's easy to imagine them rushing to check readings and trying to communicate with others to understand the full scale of the disaster.
00;35;32;15 - 00;35;41;28
Speaker 1
Give me an idea of the pace and scale of the evacuation.
00;35;42;00 - 00;36;07;02
Speaker 2
Certainly, the evacuation of Pripyat began about 36 hours after the explosion. It was massive in scale, with busses and vehicles quickly mobilized to move tens of thousands of residents. It was urgent, but also orderly, as people were told to pack only essential belongings, not knowing they would never return to their home.
00;36;07;05 - 00;36;13;08
Speaker 1
36 hours seems like a long time.
00;36;13;11 - 00;36;34;01
Speaker 2
It definitely does sound like a long time, especially given the seriousness of the situation at the time. They were still trying to understand what was happening and how severe it was. But once they realized the extent of the radiation, they acted quickly to get everyone to safety.
00;36;34;04 - 00;36;47;00
Speaker 1
Okay, so when this explosion happened, did everybody evacuate the facility or did they stay and try and, mitigate it?
00;36;47;02 - 00;37;06;23
Speaker 2
Right after the explosion, many of the workers stayed and tried to understand and contain the situation. They worked heroically to try to mitigate the damage, even though they didn't fully grasp the danger at that moment. It was only later that the full evacuation of the facility happened.
00;37;06;25 - 00;37;30;05
Speaker 1
Okay, so that's really interesting. When I when I think about a situation like that, I think about like all the alarm gets pulled in, like everybody runs out like a school fire drill, but like, it probably isn't like that because, of the people who, as you said, like do stay around to mitigate an even bigger decision.
00;37;30;06 - 00;37;53;22
Speaker 2
Definitely not an immediate evacuation. A lot of people stayed behind trying to figure out what was going on and doing their best to contain the situation. It was only after they realized the extent of the radiation and the danger that more people were evacuated. So it was definitely a more complex and gradual process than just an immediate evacuation.
00;37;53;25 - 00;38;03;19
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you tell me about the love and, what were his next steps after the explosion?
00;38;03;22 - 00;38;29;09
Speaker 2
After the explosion, Dyatlov and the others in the control room were to understand what had happened. And I had to manage the immediate aftermath. He was heavily involved in the initial response efforts and stayed on site. But ultimately he, like many others, suffered from acute radiation exposure and had to be hospitalized. Not long after.
00;38;29;11 - 00;38;43;18
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you let's let's dive into the 36 hours that occurred after the explosion, but before the full evacuation.
00;38;43;20 - 00;39;17;26
Speaker 2
Absolutely. In those first 36 hours, the plant workers and emergency responders were doing everything they could to cool the reactor and contain the radiation. There was a lot of confusion and uncertainty about the severity of the situation. Meanwhile, the residents of power be at work, continuing their daily lives, not yet aware of the true danger. Authorities were starting to plan the evacuation, but it took some time to coordinate everything and make sure that everyone could be moved out safely.
00;39;17;28 - 00;39;21;00
Speaker 1
How do you spell Pripyat?
00;39;21;02 - 00;39;35;18
Speaker 2
It really is quite a lot to take in, and it's understandable. If you have any other quick. I'm always here to help and chat about anything you'd like. Feel free to let me know if there's something else on your mind, or if you want to dive into a different topic.
00;39;35;21 - 00;39;45;24
Speaker 1
Chat. How do you spell the town next to Chernobyl?
00;39;45;26 - 00;39;57;07
Speaker 2
The town's name is spelled Pripyat, pronounced Pripyat.
00;39;57;09 - 00;40;22;10
Speaker 1
Okay, so take us back into, what Dyatlov is doing during that first 36 hours. They're cooling the reactor, and they're trying to contain the radiation. And that means that people are coming on to shift after the meltdown has started. Can you tell me a little bit more about that?
00;40;22;12 - 00;40;53;27
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So after the meltdown began, many workers who were arriving for their shifts weren't fully aware of the severity of what had happened. They joined in the efforts to control the situation, often without full protective gear, which led to a lot of them being exposed to dangerous levels of radiation. It was a heroic effort, but it came at a great personal cost to many of them.
00;40;54;00 - 00;41;01;21
Speaker 1
Okay, can you give me more details about what they worked on during that 36 hours?
00;41;01;24 - 00;41;28;27
Speaker 2
During those first 86 hours, the workers were focused on tasks like manually pumping water into the reactor to cool it down, trying to measure radiation levels and figuring out the extent of the damage. They also worked on containing fires and preventing further explosions. It was a really intense effort to stabilize the situation as much as possible.
00;41;28;29 - 00;41;38;06
Speaker 1
Okay. And then, were there any significant events that happened during this 36 hours?
00;41;38;09 - 00;42;07;16
Speaker 2
One of the significant moments was the decision to use helicopters to drop sand, lead and other materials on to the reactor to try and contain the radiation. There were also efforts to evacuate the surrounding areas and communicate with officials to figure out what steps to take next. It was definitely a series of rapid and intense developments.
00;42;07;18 - 00;42;38;23
Speaker 1
Okay, I think this is actually probably a really good area to kind of dig into and stay on for a second. I would like you to tell me what we know about, the conversations between Anatoly Dyatlov and his superiors, which is, I can't remember who it was.
00;42;38;25 - 00;42;55;02
Speaker 2
During the Chernobyl disaster, Anatoly Dyatlov and his team were in a state of confusion right after the explosion, trying to understand what had happened. Dyatlov was in communication with his superiors and colleagues, attempting to manage the crisis.
00;42;55;04 - 00;43;25;25
Speaker 1
I would like you to, tell me about the conversations that Anatoly Dyatlov had with Nikolai Foreman. I think you said his name was the engineer as well as Victor Brook. And of, operations. And then it probably even goes up to Gorbachev.
00;43;25;28 - 00;44;04;04
Speaker 2
During the Chernobyl disaster. Anatoly, be at love. Nikolai Foreman and Viktor. Broken off were key figures trying to manage the crisis. Right after the explosion, Dyatlov and Bowman were focused on assessing the damage and trying to keep the reactor cool, not fully realizing how severe the situation was, Viktor, broken off, who was the plant director, held meetings to figure out how to handle the situation, but in the beginning, they didn't fully grasp the scale of the disaster, which made their decision making even more challenging.
00;44;04;06 - 00;44;19;22
Speaker 1
Okay, so you mentioned that they were dropping sand as well as lid on everything to kind of minimize the radiation. Take me through other significant events that happened in the first 36 hours.
00;44;19;25 - 00;44;56;06
Speaker 2
Sure. Another significant event was the decision to evacuate Prabhat, which began about a day and a half after the explosion. Residents were told it would be temporary, so they only took essential belongings. There were also brave efforts by workers and firefighters to contain the radiation and prevent further fires, often at great personal risk. The situation was evolving rapidly and everyone was working under intense pressure.
00;44;56;08 - 00;45;17;02
Speaker 1
Okay, I know that you said that, that there were only a couple thousand people in the town. Can you give me an idea of the manpower that poured in to help with this disaster?
00;45;17;05 - 00;45;26;15
Speaker 2
The cleanup effort for Chernobyl was massive, involving around 600,000 workers, often referred to as liquidators. These included.
00;45;26;20 - 00;45;43;13
Speaker 1
No, I don't want to get into that just yet. We're going to touch on that in a second. But I want you to tell me about the, the early, like, first response within the first, maybe 72 hours.
00;45;43;15 - 00;46;19;09
Speaker 2
Got it. In those first 72 hours. The immediate response involve plant workers, firefighters and local authorities. Firefighters were some of the first on the scene, bravely trying to put out fires on the reactor roof. Not fully aware of the radiation levels, plant staff worked tirelessly to pump cooling water into the reactor and measure radiation levels. There was a lot of coordination and effort to stabilize things as quickly as possible.
00;46;19;12 - 00;46;33;10
Speaker 1
Okay, take me into the shoes of maybe, a mother who was wounded when exactly did the evacuation of yet occur?
00;46;33;12 - 00;46;53;20
Speaker 2
The evacuation of Pripyat began on the afternoon of April 27th, 1986, about a day and a half after the explosion. So if you imagine a mother in private, she would have been going about her normal day that morning, not realizing that she would soon need to leave everything behind.
00;46;53;22 - 00;46;57;00
Speaker 1
What day of the week was that?
00;46;57;03 - 00;46;59;17
Speaker 2
You're welcome. It's definitely a powerful.
00;46;59;17 - 00;47;10;16
Speaker 1
To hold on. You misunderstood me. I wanted to know what day of the week was, the the evacuation of Pripyat started.
00;47;10;19 - 00;47;31;01
Speaker 2
Oh, acute. You mean the evacuation of Pripyat started on April 27th, 1986, which was the day after the explosion occurred. So it was a Sunday afternoon when the evacuation actually took place.
00;47;31;03 - 00;47;40;09
Speaker 1
Okay. Can you put me in the shoes of a normal family at the start of the evacuation?
00;47;40;11 - 00;48;02;18
Speaker 2
Absolutely. Imagine. It's a quiet Sunday morning and a family in Pripyat is going about their day. Maybe having breakfast, not realizing that just a short distance away there's been a serious accident. And then all of a sudden, they get the announcement that they need to leave their home, likely thinking it would just be temporary, but not knowing they would never return.
00;48;02;18 - 00;48;12;27
Speaker 2
It must have been such a surreal and emotional moment for them.
00;48;13;00 - 00;48;25;03
Speaker 1
How does that announcement come? I imagine it happens probably over radio. But people, two people who start knocking on doors are there. Sirens?
00;48;25;05 - 00;48;54;17
Speaker 2
It was indeed a combination. They used radio announcements to inform residents, and authorities also went door to door to make sure everyone got the message. Busses were brought in and people were told to gather quickly. There were no sirens, though it was a relatively calm but urgent evacuation process.
00;48;54;19 - 00;49;01;24
Speaker 1
And how long weather people that stayed in Pripyat.
00;49;01;26 - 00;49;18;25
Speaker 2
The residents were initially told that the evacuation would be temporary, just for a few days, so they left with minimal belongings. In reality, they were never able to return to their homes permanently, and has remained largely abandoned ever since.
00;49;18;28 - 00;49;28;09
Speaker 1
So it wasn't really an option. The authorities kind of came through and just made sure everybody was out.
00;49;28;11 - 00;49;45;06
Speaker 2
Exactly. Yes. They made thorough checks to ensure that everyone had evacuated safely. They wanted to be certain that no one was left behind. So they went door to door and made sure that the entire city was cleared out in an orderly manner.
00;49;45;08 - 00;49;52;28
Speaker 1
Whether people that resisted, since it is since it is kind of invisible danger.
00;49;53;00 - 00;50;17;28
Speaker 2
Yes, they were definitely some residents who were reluctant to leave at first, especially because they were told it was temporary and the danger wasn't immediately visible. But with the authorities efforts and the realization of the seriousness of the situation, everyone eventually complied and evacuated.
00;50;18;01 - 00;50;26;09
Speaker 1
Okay, take me through it. After the 72 hour mark. And what did they end up doing?
00;50;26;12 - 00;50;53;17
Speaker 2
After those initial 72 hours, the focus shifted to longer term containment and cleanup. The Soviet government brought in a huge number of workers, often called liquidators, to help with the cleanup efforts. They constructed a sarcophagus around the reactor to contain the radiation and the evacuation zone was expanded to ensure safety. It was a massive, ongoing effort that continued for years.
00;50;53;19 - 00;51;00;21
Speaker 1
Okay, tell me about the role of a liquidator.
00;51;00;23 - 00;51;35;14
Speaker 2
The liquidators were essentially the heroes who were brought in to handle the cleanup and containment of the disaster. They included military personnel, scientists, engineers and everyday workers who took on incredibly dangerous tasks. They helped to remove radioactive debris, construct a sarcophagus around the reactor, and generally work to contain the spread of radiation, often at Great personal risk.
00;51;35;16 - 00;51;44;04
Speaker 1
Okay. Give me kind of just a brief overview of what cleaning up radioactive debris looks like.
00;51;44;07 - 00;52;15;02
Speaker 2
Absolutely. Cleaning up radioactive debris involved removing highly contaminated materials from the site. This meant using remote controlled machinery and robots, and sometimes even workers themselves, to physically remove chunks of the reactor core, graphite, and other materials that were dangerously radioactive. It was incredibly challenging and dangerous. Work.
00;52;15;05 - 00;52;30;14
Speaker 1
And so what are they doing there? They're taking away the sources of the, radioactivity and putting them in some kind of controlled environment and transporting them out.
00;52;30;16 - 00;52;56;24
Speaker 2
Exactly. That's right. They would carefully remove the radioactive debris and then transport it to secure storage facilities designed to contain them. Aviation safely. The idea was to get those highly radioactive materials out of the open environment, to reduce the spread of contamination.
00;52;56;26 - 00;53;13;05
Speaker 1
Okay. I think that, going into the shoes of one of those liquidators is going to be a whole episode on its own. We're not going to get into that right now. That'll be fun. But tell me about this sarcophagus.
00;53;13;08 - 00;53;35;09
Speaker 2
Absolutely. The sarcophagus is definitely a fascinating topic. It was basically a massive steel and concrete structure that was built to, in case the damaged reactor and contain the radiation. It was an enormous engineering feat and was completed under incredibly challenging conditions.
00;53;35;11 - 00;53;45;25
Speaker 1
Okay. Can we take a couple of minutes and go into the engineering and construction efforts that surround it?
00;53;45;28 - 00;53;56;15
Speaker 2
Absolutely. The site is officially called the shelter object was constructed very quickly within about seven months after the disaster.
00;53;56;18 - 00;54;11;16
Speaker 2
It required a massive amount of manpower and material, and the engineer had to work in. Highly radioactive conditions, often for very short shifts to limit their exposure.
00;54;11;18 - 00;54;23;08
Speaker 2
I'm sorry, but you hit the daily limit for advanced voice. You can switch to standard now. Chatting.
00;54;23;11 - 00;54;24;05
Speaker 2
I'm sorry.
00;54;24;07 - 00;54;32;02
Speaker 1
You know, you know. All right, well, the standards really.
00;54;32;05 - 00;54;45;21
Speaker 1
Hey, can you tell me about this sarcophagus or this shelter object that the Russians made? And just kind of the construction of it, like the logistics of how they got it?
00;54;45;21 - 00;54;52;15
Speaker 2
It sounds like you want to pause and highlight the objects you've created so far. What kinds of objects are you showing off?
00;54;52;17 - 00;55;16;23
Speaker 1
No. I want to continue talking about the shelter object that they built for the Chernobyl radio radiation situation. And, just kind of give me a brief overview of what it looks like, what its what its engineering is, and how it was placed.
00;55;16;26 - 00;55;43;10
Speaker 2
All right. Let's dig into that. The shelter object or sarcophagus was basically a huge steel and concrete structure built around reactor four to contain the radiation. It was put together really quickly using massive steel beams and concrete panels. It designed wasn't perfect, but it was meant to stop radioactive dust and material from escaping. Over time, it started to deteriorate, which is why they later built the new Safe Confinement to cover it.
00;55;43;17 - 00;56;07;29
Speaker 2
The original shelter was kind of boxy, with big walls and a sloped roof to prevent water from getting inside and causing more damage. So underneath that old shelter object, the destroyed reactor core and tons of radioactive debris were still there. The structure was supported by steel beams that were added in a hurry, and it had gaps and cracks that let some radiation leak out over the years.
00;56;08;02 - 00;56;30;29
Speaker 2
It really was an emergency fix, not a permanent solution. The engineering was impressive for how quickly they built it, but it wasn't airtight. They used concrete panels and steel trusses, but they had to work in super dangerous conditions, so some parts weren't as strong as they'd hoped. That's why the new faith confinement was needed later to keep it stable and contain the radiation.
00;56;30;29 - 00;56;56;23
Speaker 2
Even better, the new safe confinement is like a giant arch shaped structure that slides over the old shelter object. It's made of steel, much bigger and more durable, and it fully encloses the old sarcophagus to prevent any more radioactive material from escaping. It also has cranes inside so they can dismantle parts safely. So the new safe confinement was finished around 2016, and it's designed to last at least 100 years.
00;56;56;25 - 00;57;23;00
Speaker 2
It's a huge engineering feat, basically locking in all the remaining radiation and giving workers a safer environment to keep cleaning things up inside. It really is impressive when you think about it. The entire arch is about 108m high and spans 257m, so it's big enough to cover a football field, and it was built away from the reactor and then slid into place on special track.
00;57;23;02 - 00;57;44;12
Speaker 2
Yeah, it was built off site because the radiation levels right next to the reactor were too high for long term construction work. So they assembled the whole arch a short distance away, then used a special system of track to slide it over the old shelter object. Exactly. That sliding process was really precise and took several days to complete.
00;57;44;14 - 00;58;08;03
Speaker 2
It was one of the biggest moves of a structure like that ever done. Pretty amazing engineering. When you think about how dangerous the conditions were, absolutely. They needed it to fit perfectly so it would seal off the old sarcophagus and keep water out. The better seal means less risk of radioactive particles escaping, and less corrosion of the damaged reactor inside.
00;58;08;06 - 00;58;31;16
Speaker 2
Yes, the new safe confinement also includes a ventilation system with filters to control any air that moves in or out, and cranes inside so workers can safely dismantle unstable parts of the old shelter object. It's a much safer way to manage the long term cleanup. It really does show how much engineering had to adapt to the unique challenges of Chernobyl.
00;58;31;18 - 00;59;00;08
Speaker 2
Even decades later, they're still working to contain and eventually dismantle what's left inside. It really is amazing. If you imagine it now, there's that huge gleaming arch covering the old reactor, almost like a giant steel shield. Inside grew bill monitor radiation levels, maintain the structure, and plan for the eventual removal of the radioactive debris. Yeah, you could say it's like a giant protective dome just on a much bigger and more complex scale.
00;59;00;10 - 00;59;33;02
Speaker 2
Its main job is to stop radiation leap and create a safer space for the ongoing cleanup work. That could take decades more. It really does. And considering the original shelter object was only meant to last about 30 years, the new safe Confinement is a massive improvement to keep the site stable for the long term. It's a huge symbol of how much effort went into containing that disaster, even long after the initial accident and the lessons learned bear shaped how the world handles nuclear safety today.
00;59;33;05 - 01;00;11;07
Speaker 2
Definitely. So many countries change their safety standards and reactor design because of what happened at Chernobyl. It's a reminder of how powerful nuclear energy is and how important it is to manage it responsibly. Yeah, exactly. It really pushed engineers and policymakers to rethink reactor design, emergency planning and international cooperation on nuclear safety. Chernobyl changed a lot. It's kind of wild to think that one accident reshaped so many safety standards, and even inspired new technologies to keep reactors safer around the world, and it also showed how global the impact can be.
01;00;11;09 - 01;00;33;15
Speaker 2
Radioactive fallout didn't stop at borders, but it made countries work together more closely.
01;00;33;18 - 01;00;42;28
Speaker 1
Chat I don't know what you're doing there. It was pretty impressive.
01;00;43;01 - 01;01;01;22
Speaker 1
Okay, I think we're going to end it there. As you can see, ChatGPT was asking itself questions. I'm not exactly sure what happened there, but it was kind of cool. All right, that's it for today. Please.